Matthew 9 Study Notes
General
In Matthew 9:9-13, Jesus called Matthew, a tax collector, to follow Him, then ate dinner with "tax collectors and sinners." When the Pharisees objected, what reason did Jesus give for spending time with them?
Answer: He said it is the sick who need a doctor, and that He came to call sinners, not the righteous
Jesus answers with two linked statements. First, an image: it is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick (9:12) — people who know they're spiritually sick are exactly who a Savior comes for. Second, He quotes the prophet Hosea, whose words teach that God desires mercy over religious ritual (9:13), meaning God cares more about a heart that shows mercy than about people going through religious motions while looking down on others. He sums up His own mission plainly: He did not come to call the righteous, but sinners (9:13) — and Matthew, a tax collector turned disciple, is living proof of exactly that mission.
- Matthew 9:11 (BSB)“When the Pharisees saw this, they asked His disciples, 'Why does your Teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?'”The Pharisees' objection to Jesus eating with tax collectors and sinners.
- Matthew 9:12 (BSB)“On hearing this, Jesus said, 'It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick.'”Jesus' image explaining why He associates with sinners.
- Matthew 9:13 (BSB)“But go and learn what this means: 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.”Jesus' citation of Hosea and His mission statement summarizing why He calls sinners.
- Hosea 6:6 (BSB)“For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and the knowledge of God rather than burnt offerings.”Is the original prophecy Jesus quotes in 9:13, showing God has always valued mercy over empty religious ritual.
- 1 Timothy 1:15 (BSB)“This is a trustworthy saying, worthy of full acceptance: Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the worst.”Paul later states the same mission in his own words, confirming Christ's purpose was to save sinners, not reward the self-righteous.
- Romans 5:8 (BSB)“But God proves His love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”Shows the same pattern: God's mercy in Christ reaches people precisely while they are still sinners, not after they clean themselves up.
Theological
Jesus's self-description in Matthew 9:13 — "I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners" — read alongside His quotation of Hosea 6:6, reframes His mission around what principle?
Answer: Mercy extended to those who know their need, not merit earned by those who suppose themselves already righteous
Jesus's citation of Hosea 6:6 sets mercy against the Pharisees' preoccupation with ritual boundary-keeping — who one eats with. His stated mission, to call sinners rather than the self-righteous, locates the target of His call in those aware of their need, not in those confident in their own standing. Romans 5:8 supplies the logic underneath: God's mercy in Christ reaches its objects while they are still sinners, prior to any reform on their part. 1 Timothy 1:15 shows this remained the church's settled understanding of Christ's mission. Matthew's own inclusion among the sinners called (9:9) is the narrative's own illustration of the principle Jesus states.
- Matthew 9:11 (BSB)“When the Pharisees saw this, they asked His disciples, 'Why does your Teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?'”The Pharisees' objection to Jesus eating with tax collectors and sinners.
- Matthew 9:12 (BSB)“On hearing this, Jesus said, 'It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick.'”Jesus' image explaining why He associates with sinners.
- Matthew 9:13 (BSB)“But go and learn what this means: 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.”Jesus' citation of Hosea and His mission statement summarizing why He calls sinners.
- Hosea 6:6 (BSB)“For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and the knowledge of God rather than burnt offerings.”Establishes the divine priority — mercy over ritual — that Jesus's mission statement in 9:13 directly applies.
- 1 Timothy 1:15 (BSB)“This is a trustworthy saying, worthy of full acceptance: Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the worst.”Confirms the church's later doctrinal summary of Christ's mission matches exactly what Jesus states of Himself in 9:13.
- Romans 5:8 (BSB)“But God proves His love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”Supplies the theological basis for why Jesus calls sinners rather than the self-righteous: mercy precedes reform, not the reverse.
General
In Matthew 9:35-38, why does Matthew say Jesus was moved with compassion for the crowds He saw?
Answer: Because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd
As Jesus travels teaching, preaching, and healing (9:35), He looks at the crowds and feels genuine compassion, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd (9:36) — people without anyone truly leading and caring for them well. His response isn't just emotion; it turns into a call to action: the harvest is plentiful but the workers are few (9:37), so He tells His disciples to ask God to send out more workers into that harvest (9:38).
- Matthew 9:36 (BSB)“When He saw the crowds, He was moved with compassion for them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd.”Jesus' compassion for the crowds, described as sheep without a shepherd.
- Matthew 9:37 (BSB)“Then He said to His disciples, 'The harvest is plentiful, but the workers are few.'”Jesus' assessment of the need for more workers, turning compassion into a call to action.
- Numbers 27:17 (BSB)“who will go out and come in before them, and who will lead them out and bring them in, so that the congregation of the LORD will not be like sheep without a shepherd.”Is the exact image Matthew 9:36 echoes — Moses himself prayed that Israel would not be left "like sheep without a shepherd."
- Ezekiel 34:5 (BSB)“They were scattered for lack of a shepherd, and when they were scattered they became food for all the wild beasts.”Shows this same image used to describe Israel's leaders failing the people, giving the phrase in Matthew 9:36 its full weight.
- John 4:35 (BSB)“Do you not say, 'There are still four months until the harvest'? I tell you, lift up your eyes and look at the fields, for they are ripe for harvest.”Shows Jesus using the same harvest picture elsewhere in His ministry to describe people ready to respond to God.
Theological
Matthew 9:36-38 pairs Jesus's compassion for the crowds ("like sheep without a shepherd") with a command to pray for laborers. What does the shepherd imagery, drawn from Israel's history, communicate about the crowds' condition?
Answer: That they were left without faithful spiritual leadership, echoing Israel's recurring need for God-appointed shepherds
The image of sheep without a shepherd is not new with Jesus — it echoes Moses's own prayer in Numbers 27:17 that Israel not be left without a leader, and Ezekiel 34:5 uses the same picture to indict Israel's failed shepherds for scattering the flock. By applying this exact language to the crowds around Him, Jesus diagnoses their condition as a failure of spiritual leadership reaching back through Israel's history, not merely a passing feeling of pity. His response turns compassion into commissioning: the harvest language He uses again in John 4:35 becomes, here, a call for His disciples to pray that God would send out the very shepherd-laborers the crowds lack.
- Matthew 9:36 (BSB)“When He saw the crowds, He was moved with compassion for them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd.”Jesus' compassion for the crowds, described as sheep without a shepherd.
- Matthew 9:37 (BSB)“Then He said to His disciples, 'The harvest is plentiful, but the workers are few.'”Jesus' assessment of the need for more workers, turning compassion into a call to action.
- Numbers 27:17 (BSB)“who will go out and come in before them, and who will lead them out and bring them in, so that the congregation of the LORD will not be like sheep without a shepherd.”Shows the same shepherdless condition being a recurring concern in Israel's history, not a new observation by Jesus.
- Ezekiel 34:5 (BSB)“They were scattered for lack of a shepherd, and when they were scattered they became food for all the wild beasts.”Directly indicts Israel's failed shepherds for the very scattering Jesus observes in the crowds before Him.
- John 4:35 (BSB)“Do you not say, 'There are still four months until the harvest'? I tell you, lift up your eyes and look at the fields, for they are ripe for harvest.”Shows the same harvest imagery used elsewhere by Jesus to turn compassion for people's condition into a call to active mission.
General
In Matthew 9:1-8, some scribes accused Jesus of blasphemy when He told a paralyzed man his sins were forgiven. How did Jesus prove that His claim to forgive sins was backed by real authority?
Answer: By healing the man's paralysis, so that he got up and walked home
Jesus points out that anyone can say a person's sins are forgiven — no one watching can check whether it actually happened. So He does something everyone can check: He heals the man's paralysis on the spot, telling him to get up, pick up his mat, and go home (9:6). The visible miracle proves the invisible one really happened, because both came from the same authority. Matthew notes the crowd's reaction: they were filled with awe and glorified God for giving such authority to men (9:8).
- Matthew 9:2 (BSB)“Just then some men brought to Him a paralytic lying on a mat. When Jesus saw their faith, He said to the paralytic, 'Take courage, son; your sins are forgiven.'”Jesus' initial pronouncement of forgiveness over the paralyzed man.
- Matthew 9:3 (BSB)“On seeing this, some of the scribes said to themselves, 'This man is blaspheming!'”The scribes' silent charge against Jesus for claiming to forgive sins.
- Matthew 9:6 (BSB)“"But so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins" - then He said to the paralytic, "Get up, pick up your mat, and go home."”Jesus' visible, verifiable sign proving His authority to forgive sins.
- Matthew 9:8 (BSB)“When the crowds saw this, they were filled with awe and glorified God, who had given such authority to men.”The crowd's response of awe at witnessing this authority.
- Mark 2:7 (BSB)“Why does this man speak like this? He is blaspheming! Who can forgive sins but God alone?”This is the exact objection running through the scribes' minds in Matthew's account — forgiving sins was understood as something only God can do.
- Isaiah 43:25 (BSB)“I, yes I, am He who blots out your transgressions for My own sake and remembers your sins no more.”Shows that in the Old Testament, forgiving sins completely is something God alone claims to do, which is why Jesus's claim was so startling.
- Psalm 103:3 (BSB)“He who forgives all your iniquities and heals all your diseases,”Pairs forgiveness of sin and healing of disease together as one description of the LORD's work, exactly the pairing Jesus performs in Matthew 9:1-8.
Theological
The scribes' silent charge in Matthew 9:3 ("This man is blaspheming!") reacts to what implicit claim in Jesus's pronouncement "your sins are forgiven" (9:2), and how does 9:6-8 vindicate it?
Answer: Jesus is claiming a divine prerogative — the authority to forgive sins that Scripture reserves for God alone — and He vindicates it with a visible, verifiable miracle
The scribes' unspoken reasoning is exactly what Mark's parallel account states outright: forgiving sins is something only God can do (Mark 2:7). By pronouncing the paralytic's sins forgiven, Jesus is not offering vague comfort but exercising a prerogative Isaiah 43:25 assigns to God alone. He does not defend the claim by argument; He vindicates it empirically. Because the effects of forgiveness are invisible, He performs a visible, immediately checkable sign — commanding the paralytic to get up, pick up his mat, and go home (9:6) — as evidence that the authority behind both acts is the same, and it is divine. Psalm 103:3 already held these two works, forgiving iniquity and healing disease, together as descriptions of the LORD Himself; Matthew 9 shows that unity enacted in Jesus.
- Matthew 9:2 (BSB)“Just then some men brought to Him a paralytic lying on a mat. When Jesus saw their faith, He said to the paralytic, 'Take courage, son; your sins are forgiven.'”Jesus' initial pronouncement of forgiveness over the paralyzed man.
- Matthew 9:3 (BSB)“On seeing this, some of the scribes said to themselves, 'This man is blaspheming!'”The scribes' silent charge against Jesus for claiming to forgive sins.
- Matthew 9:6 (BSB)“"But so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins" - then He said to the paralytic, "Get up, pick up your mat, and go home."”Jesus' visible, verifiable sign proving His authority to forgive sins.
- Matthew 9:8 (BSB)“When the crowds saw this, they were filled with awe and glorified God, who had given such authority to men.”The crowd's response of awe at witnessing this authority.
- Mark 2:7 (BSB)“Why does this man speak like this? He is blaspheming! Who can forgive sins but God alone?”States outright the theological objection Matthew's scribes only think to themselves — forgiving sins is a divine prerogative.
- Isaiah 43:25 (BSB)“I, yes I, am He who blots out your transgressions for My own sake and remembers your sins no more.”Grounds the scribes' objection in Scripture: the LORD alone claims the authority to blot out sin.
- Psalm 103:3 (BSB)“He who forgives all your iniquities and heals all your diseases,”Establishes forgiving sin and healing disease as a single divine work, the same unity Jesus enacts and thereby claims for Himself.
General
True or False: In Matthew 9:32-34, after Jesus healed a mute demon-possessed man so that he could speak, the crowd said nothing like this had ever been seen in Israel, while the Pharisees claimed Jesus was driving out demons by the ruler of demons.
Answer: True
That's exactly what happens: the crowds are amazed and say nothing like this has ever been seen in Israel (9:33), but the Pharisees respond by attributing the power to the prince of demons (9:34). Two very different reactions to the same event — one of wonder, one of hostile suspicion — even though both groups saw the identical miracle.
- Matthew 9:33 (BSB)“And when the demon had been driven out, the man began to speak. The crowds were amazed and said, 'Nothing like this has ever been seen in Israel!'”The crowd's amazed response to the mute man speaking.
- Matthew 9:34 (BSB)“But the Pharisees said, 'It is by the prince of demons that He drives out demons.'”The Pharisees' hostile alternative explanation for the same miracle.
- Mark 3:22 (BSB)“And the scribes who had come down from Jerusalem were saying, "He is possessed by Beelzebul," and, "By the prince of the demons He drives out demons."”Records the same accusation made against Jesus elsewhere, showing this was a repeated tactic by His religious opponents.
- Matthew 12:24 (BSB)“But when the Pharisees heard this, they said, "Only by Beelzebul, the prince of demons, does this man drive out demons."”Shows the Pharisees leveling this identical charge again later in Matthew's Gospel, confirming it as their standard explanation for His power.
- John 12:37 (BSB)“Although Jesus had performed so many signs in their presence, they still did not believe in Him.”Names the broader pattern on display here: some people refused to believe even after directly witnessing Jesus's miracles.
Theological
True or False: The Pharisees' accusation in Matthew 9:34, that Jesus drives out demons "by the prince of demons," illustrates that a direct, undeniable miracle can be witnessed and still be met with willful unbelief rather than faith.
Answer: True
The Pharisees do not dispute that a genuine miracle occurred — a mute demoniac now speaks. What they dispute is its source, attributing divine power to Satan rather than concede who Jesus is. This is unbelief operating not from lack of evidence but in spite of it, the same pattern John 12:37 names explicitly: seeing Jesus perform sign after sign was not enough to produce belief in the people who witnessed it. Mark 3:22 and Matthew 12:24 show this was not a one-time lapse but the Pharisees' settled explanation for His power, repeated across His ministry.
- Matthew 9:33 (BSB)“And when the demon had been driven out, the man began to speak. The crowds were amazed and said, 'Nothing like this has ever been seen in Israel!'”The crowd's amazed response to the mute man speaking.
- Matthew 9:34 (BSB)“But the Pharisees said, 'It is by the prince of demons that He drives out demons.'”The Pharisees' hostile alternative explanation for the same miracle.
- Mark 3:22 (BSB)“And the scribes who had come down from Jerusalem were saying, "He is possessed by Beelzebul," and, "By the prince of the demons He drives out demons."”Shows the same willful misattribution of divine power to Satan occurring elsewhere, evidence unbelief was the pattern, not an isolated reaction.
- Matthew 12:24 (BSB)“But when the Pharisees heard this, they said, "Only by Beelzebul, the prince of demons, does this man drive out demons."”Confirms the Pharisees repeated this same explanation later, showing settled unbelief rather than a momentary lapse in judgment.
- John 12:37 (BSB)“Although Jesus had performed so many signs in their presence, they still did not believe in Him.”States directly the theological point this episode illustrates: evidence alone does not produce belief.
General
When John's disciples asked why Jesus's disciples didn't fast like they did, Jesus answered with pictures of wedding guests, a patched garment, and wine in wineskins (Matthew 9:14-17). What point was He making?
Answer: That what He was bringing was something new that could not simply be squeezed into old religious patterns and expectations
Jesus starts with an obvious picture: wedding guests don't mourn while the groom is still with them (9:15) — it isn't the right time for that kind of fasting, because Jesus, the bridegroom, is present. Then He gives two everyday illustrations: sewing new, unshrunk cloth onto an old garment tears it worse, and pouring new wine into old, brittle wineskins bursts them (9:16-17). In both cases, the problem isn't that either the old or new thing is bad — it's that they don't belong forced together. Jesus is saying that what He is bringing doesn't fit inside the old boxes people expected; it needs room to be what it actually is.
- Hebrews 8:13 (BSB)“By speaking of a new covenant, He has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.”Explains the same old-versus-new logic Jesus's wineskin picture assumes — something genuinely new doesn't just patch the old, it replaces it.
- 2 Corinthians 5:17 (BSB)“Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away. Behold, the new has come!”States the broader New Testament theme of newness in Christ that Jesus's wineskin illustration points toward.
Theological
Jesus's twin illustrations in Matthew 9:16-17 (unshrunk cloth on an old garment; new wine in old wineskins) illustrate what relationship between what He was inaugurating and the existing religious forms of His hearers?
Answer: Incompatibility of mere patchwork accommodation — what He brings requires its own new form rather than insertion into the old
Both illustrations turn on the incompatibility of forced combination, not outright rejection of the old as worthless. New, unshrunk cloth stitched onto old fabric tears it further; new wine, still fermenting, bursts wineskins that have already stretched and hardened. Jesus's point is structural: what He inaugurates is not decoration added to existing practice but something requiring its own appropriate form. Hebrews 8:13 later states this directly of the covenant Christ brings — it does not patch the old but renders it obsolete. 2 Corinthians 5:17 names the same newness from the individual believer's side, describing the old life as having given way entirely to the new.
- Hebrews 8:13 (BSB)“By speaking of a new covenant, He has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.”Confirms that the newness Jesus describes is not supplementary to the old order but supersedes it.
- 2 Corinthians 5:17 (BSB)“Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away. Behold, the new has come!”Applies the same structural newness Jesus describes in 9:16-17 to the individual believer's own transformation.
General
In Matthew 9:27-31, two blind men followed Jesus crying out for mercy, addressing Him by a specific title. What title did they use, and what did Jesus say about the healing?
Answer: "Son of David"; it would be done "according to your faith"
The two blind men cry out for mercy, addressing Jesus as Son of David (9:27) — a title loaded with meaning, since it pointed to the promised king from David's line. When Jesus asks if they believe He can heal them, they say yes, and He touches their eyes, telling them it will be done for them according to their faith (9:29). Their eyes are opened. Their use of a royal, Messianic title, combined with simple trust that Jesus could do what they asked, is exactly the response Jesus honors.
- Matthew 9:27 (BSB)“As Jesus went on from there, two blind men followed Him, crying out, 'Have mercy on us, Son of David!'”The two blind men's request, addressing Jesus with a title loaded with messianic meaning.
- Matthew 9:29 (BSB)“Then He touched their eyes and said, 'According to your faith will it be done to you.'”Jesus' response granting the healing in proportion to their faith.
- Isaiah 35:5 (BSB)“Then the eyes of the blind will be opened and the ears of the deaf unstopped.”Is the prophecy this healing visibly fulfills — the coming of God's promised deliverance was to include the blind receiving sight.
- 2 Samuel 7:13 (BSB)“He will build a house for My Name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever.”Is the covenant promise behind the title "Son of David" — the two men address Jesus as the promised heir to David's throne.
- Mark 10:47 (BSB)“When he heard that it was Jesus of Nazareth, he began to cry out, "Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!"”Records another blind man using the identical title, showing this was a recognized way of addressing Jesus as Israel's promised king.
Theological
The two blind men's address in Matthew 9:27, "Son of David," invokes what covenantal background, and what does Jesus's healing in response to their faith confirm about His identity?
Answer: It invokes the Davidic covenant's promise of a coming king, and the healing confirms Jesus as that promised heir, granted in response to faith rather than merit
Son of David is not a generic honorific; it deliberately invokes God's covenant promise to David of an heir whose throne would endure forever (2 Samuel 7:13). By addressing Jesus this way and asking for mercy, the two blind men identify Him as that promised king. Isaiah 35:5 had already tied the recovery of sight to the coming of God's promised deliverance, so the healing itself functions as confirming evidence of who Jesus is. Jesus grants it in proportion to their faith (9:29) — responding to trust, not to merit or status — which Mark's account of another blind man crying the same title (Mark 10:47) shows was becoming a recognized way of appealing to Jesus as Israel's promised king.
- Matthew 9:27 (BSB)“As Jesus went on from there, two blind men followed Him, crying out, 'Have mercy on us, Son of David!'”The two blind men's request, addressing Jesus with a title loaded with messianic meaning.
- Matthew 9:29 (BSB)“Then He touched their eyes and said, 'According to your faith will it be done to you.'”Jesus' response granting the healing in proportion to their faith.
- 2 Samuel 7:13 (BSB)“He will build a house for My Name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever.”Grounds the title "Son of David" in God's specific covenant promise, which the blind men's cry invokes.
- Isaiah 35:5 (BSB)“Then the eyes of the blind will be opened and the ears of the deaf unstopped.”Ties the healing itself to Israel's prophetic expectation, making the miracle confirming evidence of Jesus's identity.
- Mark 10:47 (BSB)“When he heard that it was Jesus of Nazareth, he began to cry out, "Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!"”Shows the same covenantal title being used elsewhere to appeal to Jesus, confirming it as a recognized messianic address.
General
In Matthew 9:18-26, a woman who had suffered bleeding for twelve years touched Jesus's cloak and was healed, and Jesus then raised a synagogue leader's daughter from death. What did Jesus tell the woman was responsible for her healing?
Answer: Her faith
The woman believed that if she could just touch Jesus's cloak, she would be healed (9:21), and she was right — but Jesus makes sure she, and everyone else, understands why: it was her faith, not the touch itself, that healed her (9:22). Her condition would have made her ceremonially unclean under the law, which is likely why she approached secretly from behind rather than openly. Jesus doesn't rebuke her for touching Him — He commends the faith behind the touch. In the same passage, Jesus goes on to Jairus's house and raises his daughter, who had just died, showing that His power reaches even past death itself.
- Matthew 9:22 (BSB)“Jesus turned and saw her. 'Take courage, daughter,' He said, 'your faith has healed you.' And the woman was healed from that very hour.”Jesus' declaration that the woman's faith, not the cloak, was what healed her.
- Leviticus 15:25 (BSB)“When a woman has a discharge of her blood for many days at a time other than her menstrual period, or if it continues beyond her period, she will be unclean all the days of her unclean discharge, just as she is during the days of her menstruation.”Explains why her condition carried social and religious stigma, which is why she approached Jesus quietly rather than announcing herself.
- Hebrews 11:1 (BSB)“Now faith is the assurance of what we hope for and the certainty of what we do not see.”Defines the kind of faith Jesus commends in the woman — confident trust in what isn't yet seen.
- John 11:25 (BSB)“I am the resurrection and the life. Whoever believes in Me will live, even though he dies.”Shows that the same power Jesus displays raising Jairus's daughter, power over death itself, is central to who Jesus claims to be.
Theological
In Matthew 9:20-22, Jesus attributes the woman's healing not to the cloak she touched but to "your faith." What role does this assign to faith in receiving Christ's power?
Answer: Faith is the means by which His power is received, not a force that generates power on its own
Jesus's wording is deliberate: it is not the cloak that healed her, but her faith (9:22). Faith here is not the source of power — Jesus is — but the means by which someone in need reaches out and receives it, matching Hebrews 11:1's description of faith as confident reliance on what is not yet seen. The woman's approach, from behind and in secret, also reflects the real social cost of her condition, since Leviticus 15:25 describes the uncleanness it carried, which makes her faith bolder, not less real. The same chapter pairs this healing with Jesus raising Jairus's daughter from death, underscoring that the power received by faith is nothing less than the power John 11:25 identifies as belonging to Christ Himself as the resurrection and the life.
- Matthew 9:22 (BSB)“Jesus turned and saw her. 'Take courage, daughter,' He said, 'your faith has healed you.' And the woman was healed from that very hour.”Jesus' declaration that the woman's faith, not the cloak, was what healed her.
- Leviticus 15:25 (BSB)“When a woman has a discharge of her blood for many days at a time other than her menstrual period, or if it continues beyond her period, she will be unclean all the days of her unclean discharge, just as she is during the days of her menstruation.”Shows the real social and religious cost her faith overcame, since her condition rendered her ceremonially unclean.
- Hebrews 11:1 (BSB)“Now faith is the assurance of what we hope for and the certainty of what we do not see.”Defines faith as confident reliance rather than a power source, matching the instrumental role Jesus assigns it in 9:22.
- John 11:25 (BSB)“I am the resurrection and the life. Whoever believes in Me will live, even though he dies.”Identifies the ultimate power behind both healings in this passage as belonging to Christ's own identity, not to faith itself.